Monday, January 31, 2011

MyNotes - #txedbudget Rescuing the Tech Allotment?


Is it possible the state tech allotment might find a savior in Senator Shapiro? One can only hope....

Quotes:

Shapiro: 'Stars out of alignment' for schools | Trail Blazers Blog | dallasnews.com

    • Shapiro: 'Stars out of alignment' for schools 1:12 PM Mon, Jan 31, 2011 | Permalink Robert T. Garrett/Reporter    Bio |  E-mail  | News tips
      • Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, says there's no one group to blame, no one document or bill that's caused a fiscal shipwreck for Texas public schools this session.
        • The state has no money to replace $3.3 billion of federal stimulus money it gave the schools last session. It has no money for the $2.2 billion schools will need to cover projected growth in student enrollment. Nor does the state have $2 billion to offset school districts' loss of tax revenue from a decline in property values, though under current law it's supposed to do that. And so on.
          • She told reporters later that she doesn't like how the budget zeroes out money for remedial help for students; new textbooks and online instructional materials; and schools' "technology allotments," a per-student stipend for computers and such. Shapiro said, though, that she'll push on the Finance Committee for the state to use some rainy-day money and possibly fix the business franchise tax, which hasn't produced as much money as expected since it was broadened to cover more businesses five years ago. And she said her Education Committee will look at relieving school districts of various "mandates," not just a cap on class sizes but laws that prevent them from furloughing teachers, if needed, to balance their budgets. In the end, she predicts a better deal for schools than is now on the table.


            This message was sent to you by mguhlin via Diigo

            Getting too many email alerts? Change your email alert setting preference here.

            Job Posting - Instructional Technology Specialist

            Source: http://utdirect.utexas.edu/pnjobs/pnjobsvw.WBX?job_nbr=11-01-26-01-8108
            Job title Instructional Technology Specialist
            FLSA status Exempt
            Posting number 11-01-26-01-8108
            Job status Open
            Basic Information
            Date available Immediately
            Position duration Funding expected to continue
            Position open to all applicants
            Monthly salary $4583 negotiable depending on qualifications.
            Hours per week 40.00 Standard from 800AM to 500PM
            Location Austin (main campus)
            Hiring department Ctr Teaching Learning http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl
            Number of vacancies 1
            General notes None provided
            Required Application Materials
            A Resume is required in order to apply.
            A Letter of Interest is required in order to apply.
            A List of 3 References is required in order to apply.

            Go to Document Management to upload required materials.
            Additional Information
            Purpose of position Lead the instructional design, development, implementation and evaluation of the multimedia and rich Internet applications for instruction, and to collaborate with faculty in the integration of digital media in instruction in support of the Course Transformation Program and the Center for Teaching and Learning.

            Essential functions Help develop learning goals and outcomes; consult on and oversee the design, implementation, use and evaluation of instructional technologies that support effective learning environments; manage the design, development, and implementation of instructional technology tools and resources; investigate and evaluate technology solutions and make recommendations for implementation; and support faculty in the use of instructional technologies. Consult with and provide technical expertise to university administration, faculty, and staff in the areas of: instructional use of technology, innovative learning models, and technology-enabled educational strategies. Research and evaluate breakthrough technology-enabled educational strategies and next-generation learning models and write reports and scholarly articles of the findings.

            Marginal/Incidental functions Other related functions as assigned.

            Required qualifications Masters degree in Instructional Technology, Instructional Design, Curriculum and Instruction or related field with 3 years of experience in instructional development. Knowledge of instructional systems design using multimedia technologies. Knowledge of design, use, and evaluation of instructional technologies (interactive design, interactive media trends, and usability.) Experience with instructional technology integration, faculty consulting, and instructional support. Extensive experience in all phases of multimedia planning and production. Experience in evaluating and implementing emerging technologies for instruction. Equivalent combination of relevant education and experience may be substituted as appropriate.

            Preferred qualifications Ph.D. in Instructional Technology, Instructional Design, or Curriculum and Instruction and 5 years of instructional development experience. Knowledge and experience with digital video and video workflows, including Apple Final Cut Pro, video compression and optimization, digital audio production and post-production using Apple Soundtrack Pro or Adobe Soundbooth, and motion graphics using Apple Motion or Adobe After Effects. Knowledge and experience in the development of interactive and Web-based media using Adobe Flash, Adobe Flex, ActionScript 3, PHP, MySQL, HTML, and CSS. Knowledge and experience in visual design, user interface design, usability, and accessibility. Knowledge of student learning processes and implications for the development of effective learning activities. Knowledge of current best practices in assessment and faculty development. Experience in curriculum design. Extensive computer programming experience. Excellent oral and written communication skills and organizational skills. At least one year of experience in systems design, analysis, project management, and programming.

            Working conditions May work around standard office conditions. Repetitive use of a keyboard at a workstation. Use of manual dexterity.
            Usual classroom environment.
            Security sensitive; conviction verification conducted on applicant selected.

            The retirement plan for this position is Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS), subject to the position being at least 20 hours per week and at least 135 days in length.

            The University of Texas at Austin is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, citizenship status, Vietnam era or special disabled veteran's status, or sexual orientation. Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, disability accommodations will be provided, as needed.



            Get Blog Updates via Email!
            Enter your email address:


            Delivered by FeedBurner

            PingIt!
            Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
            Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org


            Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

            MyNotes - School superintendents battle big budget cuts #txedbudget


            Quotes:
            School superintendents battle big budget cuts | wfaa.com | Dallas - Fort Worth Local News
              • School superintendents battle big budget cuts
                • by BRAD WATSON
                  • Posted on January 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM
                    • Dallas would lose $240 million under the House budget bill. Fort Worth would be cut $54 million, Arlington $37 million, Frisco $84 million, McKinney $36 million, Plano $59 million and Richardson $42 million.
                      • If Dallas is not spared the possible cuts, layoffs won't be in the hundreds. "But it will be thousands of positions reduced, thousands — in plural," said Superintendent Michael Hinojosa. "We don't have that specific number yet, but we're going to lay that out to the board next week." He also said some schools may be forced to close. "Campus closures have not been on the table until now," Hinojosa said. "That's almost impossible for us to do that for next year, but 18 months from now it will definitely be on the table."
                        • Wylie ISD Superintendent John Fuller is President of the Texas Association of School Administrators. "We're not advocating a tax increase, but a search for new revenues," he said.

                          This message was sent to you by mguhlin via Diigo
                          Getting too many email alerts? Change your email alert setting preference here.

                          MyNotes - Online education disrupting traditional academic models



                          Quotes:

                          BBC News - Online education disrupting traditional academic models

                            • Online education disrupting traditional academic models
                              • By Kabir Chibber
                                • The centre of academic life at most universities is the library. The rows and rows of dusty, hastily-mended bound books and journals hint at a vast world of knowledge and draw a link between generations of students who have roamed the halls. But students in the engineering department at the University of Texas in San Antonio (UTSA) do not get that experience. Instead, they download whatever they want to any one of the terminals or their laptops.
                                • The sleek glass library seats 80 people and holds 425,000 e-books and 18,000 e-journal subscriptions. And there is no need to share because all these budding engineers can read the same text at the same time.
                                • Higher education across the world is undergoing a seismic technological shift, which is changing the conventional thinking on what constitutes getting a degree.
                                  • The problem for the academic publishers is, of course, that they cannot charge the same price for e-books as for physical books.
                                    • Digital books can also be shared and copied. Instead of 30 books for 30 students, the publishers are facing a drop in sales to one - or none.
                                      • In the US, Arizona is the heart of the online education industry. The University of Phoenix is the largest private university in North America, with 470,800 students enrolled, and a huge chunk of that is through its extensive online degree programme. Many such for-profit private universities have been criticised for accepting anyone and for lacking quality standards, but this education sector continues to grow.



                                        @GovernorPerry Save the Texas Technology Allotment #txbudget #texasbudget #texas #education @tcea


                                        In 1991, the Texas Legislature created a funding stream of $30 a student# that is dedicated to equipping our schools with technology and the resources and training to use it.  

                                        For nineteen years, this funding stream has helped finance the increasing need to integrate technology into the education of Texas children, as well as provide the technological infrastructure that is required to run a school district in this digital age. These funds help to provide the network, equipment, digital content, Internet access, and professional development that today's students and teachers need to prepare for tomorrow's economy.

                                        The 72nd Texas Legislature and every legislature since has known that a dedicated source of funding is needed to assist Texas public schools in implementing the State Board of Education’s Long-Range Plan for Technology.

                                        The plan states:

                                        “The goal in teaching and learning must be to empower young citizens to live and learn in a continuously changing 21st century environment and to enable this citizenry to effectively interact in a global marketplace. The globalization of society creates an educational challenge extending the goals of teaching and learning in the 21st century far beyond the walls of the classroom and the confines of a traditional school schedule. It is the responsibility of this state’s leadership to respond to these educational challenges by providing direction, equitable access, and resources to secure the future of the state of Texas and this nation.”#

                                        In the current economic crisis, it is even more important that the legislative leaders provide equitable access to resources that are essential to equipping this generation with the 21st century skills that are necessary to a thriving Texas economy.

                                        We understand that budget shortfalls make it difficult to increase the funding to meet the current needs of schools, but it would destroy the progress that schools have made if the funds are completely eliminated. We must not go backwards!

                                        We are asking that the Technology Allotment remain at $30 a student.  



                                        Get Blog Updates via Email!
                                        Enter your email address:


                                        Delivered by FeedBurner

                                        PingIt!
                                        Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
                                        Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org


                                        Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

                                        Guacamole and Technology

                                        Note: Another Oldybutgoody. Wrote it awhile back when I was facilitating professional learning in Eagle Pass, Texas for the school district there with colleague James McNamara. One of the funniest moments with Jim McNamara came when I was digging through the trunk of my car and found a brand new comb. As an expression of gratitude for Jim's mentorship--I had just joined the Education Service Center--I offered it to him with a long, mock heroic tale expressing my heart-felt gratitude. Jim looked me straight in the eye, and without missing a beat, took the proferred comb and said, "I'll never part with it." You see, Jim was/is bald-headed. I about fell on the ground laughing.

                                        Sitting in the Restaurante Moderno in Piedras Negras one evening after having taught a nine-hour class in Eagle Pass, having supper and sipping a stimulating beverage, James McNamara (Technology Director for a San Antonio school district) leaned back in his wood frame chair with a red cushion, "When you're evaluating what goes on the Internet, you have to ask how it adds value to what you're looking at." Biting into a guacamole-laden Chalupa from Maria, the statement made me reconsider how I might evaluate Internet published materials. The Internet Learning Institute, a five day staff development session focusing on facilitating educators' transition from surfer to server, from hunter-gatherer on the 'Net to tele-planter, lay heavily on our minds. The questions that we considered in our two hours of discussion included:

                                        1. What method of assessment will provide student publishers with feedback on web design and content that has inter-rater reliability according to specific, predetermined categories?
                                        2. How can we construct assessment tools that focus educators on establishing a reciprocal evaluative method--centered on the web design of published content--with their students?

                                        Constructing Reciprocal Evaluative Methods
                                        The Internet Learning Institute class, Publishing via the Internet, has a simple premise: To publish is to make one's work known. The advantages of publishing student work have been shown in other publications, and are widely recognized, not only for the motivational impact on students' revising and editing their work, but also for another reason. That reason is increased interactivity between web-published student materials and contacts that professionals online choose to make with students themselves.

                                        Simply put, students are no longer being graded only on their abilities, but also, for the relevancy of their work to a wide audience of technology-saavy readers. Evaluating, or extracting value as Jim McNamara puts it, means finding what in the process of the evaluation adds value to the learning process. To do this, educators have to step back and carefully consider how they extract the value of student work. In my writing workshops with students, I know I did.

                                        As a writing teacher, favoring Nanci Atwell's approach as shown in In the Middle, I fostered student writing by having student's write about those events relevant to them. In the writing workshops, I have facilitated as a classroom teacher, students never threw away what they had written, saving every lead or piece in their folders. These pieces were not graded. Students chose what they would write about, and I graded their drafts for specific pieces (i.e. active vs. passive voice, if appropriate for that piece of writing).

                                        By the end of the six weeks period, all students had been graded on the same objectives, but each had achieved the objectives at different times. The pieces that they published, graded or not, were eligible to be placed in their portfolio, a folder they decorated for the purpose of showing off at meetings with their parents.

                                        Reciprocal evaluative methods (REMs) mean that both students and teachers have to sit down together and decide on how much each will be accountable for a certain time. Grading means being aware of where in the writing process each writer was at within their piece of writing, and what objectives they were focused on.

                                        Evaluating materials published on the 'Net must involve more than just the same thing we do for print. Not because we're putting materials on the Internet, but because we have a live audience, and that with a click of the mouse, our readers can evaluate our work. But how does this happen? We had to ask ourselves several questions:
                                          • What criteria must be set?
                                          • What common objectives can our audience agree on?
                                          • How do our students decide what is relevant to our audience?

                                        "Gracias," I said to the waiter as he placed a new coke on the table. With a serious nod, he inclinded his to Jim, asking, "Otra?"

                                        What key questions could we ask that would send us down the right path to formulating a credible response to the previous questions we'd asked.

                                        Student-Teacher Agreement
                                        For us, this agreement implies that students, after negotiation with the teacher, must be aware of what they are learning and why they have set out to publish a project. Students must do 3 things: 1) be willing to evaluate themselves according to standards they have set for themselves through negotiation with their teacher; 2) assume ownership for their work, and 3) use the time in class to engage in a recursive process of project development.

                                        To ensure reciprocal evaluations, teachers and students must sit down and agree on three things before anything goes up on the web:
                                          1. How will the web published work be designed, and how many items off a web design checklist apply to this particular project?
                                            Some sample web design checklist can be found at: http://www.mguhlin.net/techserv/workshops/webdesign/checklists/
                                          2. What were the objectives that influenced the content of the materials appearing on the web, and how is one's cognizance of these objectives to be demonstrated?
                                          3. Who is the specific audience, and what statistical weight will be given to tele-evaluators that are not members of the target audience?

                                        Tele-Evaluators and Standard Deviation
                                        One chalupa and half later, more stimulating beverages, Jim and I asked ourselves the question, "What's an easy way for us to set up a web page so that visitors could provide feedback?" We carefully considered the following options:
                                        1. Set up a counter on each student's main web page. Count the # of hits to a particular web page. We immediately discounted this idea, however. Anyone could easily set a web browser to visit a particular web page, reload the page many times, thus skewing the count. Also, this really wouldn't get at the quality level or depth of the visit.
                                        2. Create a mailto: link on the student web page and request that visitors send an email. This option was discounted as well. Although a better method than the web page counter because of the more detail visitors could provide, there was no guarantee that visitors would make constructive, evaluative comments on the content. Also, there was no guarantee that the tele-evaluator had the same objectives in mind as the student and the teacher.
                                        3. Create a discussion group with a link that posted messages to a specific discussion group area, much like an electronic, web-based bulletin board (i.e. a feature of FrontPage 98, although a better program called Webboard exists, albeit at a higher price). This method of sharing messages would allow tele-evaluators to post their message, as well as link to a specific content and format within the evaluation survey. This form would structure the evaluation of the tele-evaluators in ways that would be link directly to student, teacher, and project objectives.
                                        4. Unfortunately, the three methods we considered would not work effectively. Each failed because it does not give us inter-rater reliability critical to online evaluation of web-published materials. Gut feelings and expressions such as "Great work!" provide praise without puissance. What would work, however, was a web-linked Filemaker Pro database linked to the web.

                                        The web-linked database option provided us with several advantages, but mostly the capacity to generate statistical information about the replies particularly inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability and the establishment of this reliability through standard deviation could be made possible through the use of an online database. Student web pages would contain a link to the online form. Readers agreeing to offer feedback on the web page would indicate who they are (teacher, administrator, business person, parent, etc.) and then proceed to evaluate student work on the merits of the objectives listed in the online form. The contents of the form would be fed into the database, each section would be scored and the information stored and made available in the database. In this approach, tele-evaluators are being made aware of what particular objectives students have targetted in their web-based published work prior to using the online form.

                                        Once stored in the database, the tele-evaluator, as well as others, can check the reliability of the assessment data. The information (a portion of which is statistically based) provides student with real audience feedback that focuses on their specific learning objectives, the form and function of their published work in a way neither possible or quickly available in print.

                                        Only one question remains, unanswered, however. What did they put in the soda and guacamole?



                                        Suggested Sites to Visit:

                                        Rubrics and Assessment tools (10/20/96). http://problemposing.e-commerce.com/rubrics-g.htm

                                        Web Design Checklists: http://www.mguhlin.net/techserv/workshops/webdesign/checklists/



                                        Get Blog Updates via Email!
                                        Enter your email address:


                                        Delivered by FeedBurner


                                        PingIt!
                                        Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
                                        Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org




                                        Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

                                        FISHing for IT

                                        Note: This OLDYBUTGOODY was written after I read the book FISH.


                                        I know you have better things to do this weekend than to take some time and do some reflection. We have begun a new school year and with it comes a lot of little surprises. Consider this a little surprise................. for those of you who like surprises. In your box is a book called FISH. I want you to come by and pick it up and when you have some down time, read it. It is short and could be easily read in 15 to 30 minutes! Well maybe a little longer since it has very few pictures.
                                        I want to start Wednesday morning with a conversation centered on the book. I want to have a healthy conversation about organizational culture beginning with this book. This whole year, we will be disussing organizational culture and what it means to our organization and the people who make the organization.
                                        Please be prepared to share your thoughts and how the book relates to what we are trying to accomplish.

                                        The note above arrived with my own copy of FISH. As I stuffed the book into my laptop bag, on top of the mountains of paperwork that are the mundane minutiae of every exciting project ever imagined, I wondered--Am I someone who likes surprises?

                                        The FISH book (find out more at http://www.fishphilosophy.com) shares the story of Mary Jane Ramirez, a manager charged with reviving the third floor of an organization. Caught up in her story of tragedy and triumph, I paused at the significance of the 3 of the 4 main points in the story. Then, I reflected on how an instructional technology office could address these points. This article shares those 3 points and some examples that helped me understand the point of the book. I encourage you to read this book. It’s an easy read and packs a powerful punch.

                                        1) Choose Your Attitude: No matter what kind of work you have to do, you can choose the attitude with which you approach that work. When I get up in the morning, my brain is working before I even get in the shower. There’s an excitement to solving problems, working on projects that will radically transform how we interact with others. Sometimes, our solutions work...sometimes they are not approved. This is the reality of work, yet, I can still approach that work with an attitude that keeps me refreshed and engaged.

                                        For example, a curriculum director shared that they were working on a request for proposals involving a computer-assisted instruction program for their district. Despite their opposition to this approach to using technology, they were able to approach the CAI issue with a positive attitude. This attitude allowed them to collect research, raise issues and approach this from a pedagogical, literature-based point of view.

                                        Even if the CAI approach is implemented in her district, she knows that she did her part in getting the word out. After all, after she shared the research done, it was worthwhile to review the CAI pedagogy versus tool based systems. It helps one appreciate the journey we’ve all had to make from drill-n-practice to the technology applications Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills. Her literature review, along with some I have collected, is available online at http://www.mguhlin.net/portfolio/writings/2002/ilses.html

                                        2) Play: There’s a dynamic energy present when children play. A lesson we forget as adults is how much fun it is to just play. I like to think that Instructional Technologists have not forgotten how to play. It’s that wonderful attitude of playing with the gadgets that makes sharing how they work with each other so much fun.

                                        This has been especially true in selecting products to use to create online staff development modules. With a staff of 4 people for a large school district, it’s clear that the training needs have grown beyond our capacity to deliver. How can we better deliver professional development via the web?

                                        Being able to combine video, audio, and multimedia presentations in a cohesive, easy to download package can be difficult. When you consider bandwidth, you realize the solution must find a way to compress video and audio.


                                        That’s why my team and I played with different software tools to discover which were the best. We reviewed 3 products including Viewlet Builder, Impatica On Cue (and Powerpoint), and Camtasia. In the end, we selected Impatica On Cue (http://www.impatica.com) and Camtasia (www.camtasia.com). These tools allowed us the most room for “playing” and ease of use. 

                                        3) Be There: Our responsibility to each other is to be truly present. For Instructional Technology and Library Services, this can change our interactions. It can also change how we reach out to others. For example, being present for me means not only being there face to face but also having a web site shares.

                                        In designing a web site, making sure that the web site continues to reflect the needs of the people we serve is key. It is key because a responsive, web site meets the needs of people, as well as points out how committed we are to being responsive. That’s why a web site needs to tell a story, a story of how we interact with each other. “What do you need?” “Ok, let me get that for you. Let me share something else with you, too....”

                                        I encourage you to read the FISH book and share its principles with your staff. The book reading game, I’ve found, isn’t all that bad.






                                        Get Blog Updates via Email!
                                        Enter your email address:


                                        Delivered by FeedBurner


                                        PingIt!
                                        Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
                                        Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org



                                        Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

                                        Sunday, January 30, 2011

                                        7 Tips to Managing Joblessness

                                        Source: http://pixdaus.com/pics/1206409464X4DK13I.jpg

                                        Managing joblessness...wait, did I say "joblessness?" I mean to say unemployment-induced helplessness. As many contemplate the end of their service in public schools as librarians, teachers, and instructional technologists due to Texas Budget Cuts, I've found taking the following actions helpful.

                                        1. Talk to everyone you know and ask for letters of recommendation. In a short time, those people you get letters of recommendation from may be unemployed or in different positions. Ask them now for letters that are undated and address various aspects of your expertise. Sure, you may be a technology expert, but if you're also certified in writing workshops or bilingual education--or pick your poison--then ask them to write about you from THAT perspective. That way, you have multiple letters reflecting the diverse talents you might exhibit when employed.
                                        2. Start a GoogleDoc list--I use the Spreadsheet--to keep track of all the jobs you've applied for, their status and resolution, etc. I've found this to be particularly gratifying, a concrete way to show that I'm not just sitting around waiting for someone to call me and say, "Hey, buddy, need a job?"
                                        3. Apply for jobs outside education. In this crisis, it's not enough to apply for jobs within education since there are hiring freezes in effect. Apply for jobs OUTSIDE education.
                                        4. Share the news with colleagues. Although job cuts are ubiquitous as a result of Texas State Legislature's proposed, unprecedented budget cuts, reach out to your professional learning network (PLN) and let people know what you're going through. You never know who might be reading that can provide insights.
                                        5. Update your resume, and build an ePortfolio site. When a colleague found out teammates would be losing their jobs, she offered to create ePortfolio sites for them at no cost. Of course, you can always build your ePortfolio site yourself using a wiki, such as GoogleSites (free), Wikispaces, or others and buy a domain name so that you can easily share that with others. Fortunately, I have always had a desire to keep my resume and eportfolio site up to date. You can find mine online at http://mguhlin.net
                                        6. Become familiar with how to collect unemployment and handle health insurance. Be sure to ask your current employer what benefits are available to you. Don't forget to ask about vacation days, sick days, etc. and what happens next with those. In regards to health insurance, COBRA is health care you'll probably have to pay for and is mandated by law to be provided to you. This can be expensive, especially if you have children on your plan (as I do).

                                        Finally, as a blogger/writer, I have to process my experiences by writing about them. Some how, sharing what I'm going through with others enables me to better endure what is happening to me. This improves my morale and impacts my attitude in profoundly positive ways.

                                        What works for you? Any advice you have to share?



                                        Get Blog Updates via Email!
                                        Enter your email address:


                                        Delivered by FeedBurner

                                        PingIt!
                                        Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
                                        Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org


                                        Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

                                        A New Adventure - Unemployment in K-12 Texas Schools

                                        "Pilgrim, You've Got Work to do." It's a message--borrowed from my watching of mountain man movie, Jeremiah Johnson, that resonated after a disappointing Friday. And, I expect, it's a message that will resonate with many educators--possibly 100,000 across Texas--who will find themselves unemployed or second-guessing their decision to go into K-12 public schools with legislators who have decided to "amputate" entire departments and budgets.

                                        In one of the opening sequences, mountain man wannabe Jeremiah Johnson (played by Robert Redford) is told, "Pilgrim, you got work to do" referring to his need to learn how to survive in the mountains. He was leaving the towns and turmoil of war behind him. This weekend, I've felt like abandoning public schools and escaping to the mountains, to find the marrow of the world.
                                        Note: I may soon be unemployed, and if you're reading this, I ask that you consider hiring me as a consultant or becoming part of your team. Find my online portfolio at http://mguhlin.net , where you can find copies of current and past job appraisals, letters of recommendation and more.
                                        This past Friday, I had my first inkling from our Chief Information Officer that the loss of the State Technology Allotment would certainly spell the end of a highly productive group--The Office of Instructional Technology & Learning Services. The news hit hard, as I'm sure it's sinking in across Texas for at-will district staff and instructional technologists, campus librarians, and probationary teachers--there just isn't any money to keep your position.

                                        Even if the State Legislators decide to reverse their decisions, the cuts are in progress and being made. So, what to do?

                                        Although I'm hopeful my employer will find a useful job to put me to, the facts are stark: a significant cut in pay, a return to classroom teaching at a time when I will have to accept what's available rather than what I see as best for my career, or, potential unemployment and all the stress that brings.

                                        I am still in shock myself, and it's painful to write the next true thing--I may be unemployed by June, 2011, and my team and the work we've been about for almost 10 years gone down the toilet. While I can look at my work over the last 9.5 years with some pride, it's just inconceivable that educational technology will die in its current form across Texas without the State Technology Allotment.
                                        This map shows my first efforts and implementation. Click to enlarge.

                                        When I reflect on what's gone before, I have to list the achievements--and this is but a part of the success that cloaked my team's work--that will be turned back in a stroke of the Governor's pen...each initiative saved my current employer money...not just a few thousand, but hundreds of thousands of dollars.



                                          When I arrived in my current district, there was NO....
                                        1. Centralized electronic gradebook and attendance tracking system. I found it unbelievable that there was no electronic gradebook and campaigned to get the RFP and get it implemented. The electronic gradebook now in place is used by all teachers and administrators, professional development is offered annually, and an information network of campus contacts exists to ensure success. My team is directly responsible for providing support in collaboration with other groups.
                                        2. Professional Development Tracking System. When I arrived in my current district, there was no electronic registration for professional development, no way for teachers to track their professional development. . .secretaries in every office collected sign-up sheets with teacher names and social security numbers, managing registrations via fax or phone calls. I instituted a web-based Filemaker Pro solution that enabled centralized registration management, advocating its use and growing it until the District finally recognized the need for a full-blown learning management system (LMS). We wrote the RFP, and implemented it.
                                        3. Campus Technology Representatives. This is an idea I brought with me from my time in Edgewood ISD. It's important to keep the lines of communication open, and I asked campus principals to designate 1-2 people at the campus to serve as liasons to their campuses. I saw Campus Technology Representative (CTRs) meetings as a way to interact with campuses and have a reflective dialogue about what was going on at the district AND campus. It has worked well and helped us fine-tune our support services. And, it didn't cost the District any money because the CTRs are unpaid.
                                        4. Technology Integration Lead Teacher (TILT)  and CRUISE Professional Development Programs. At the campuses, there was no way to build up capacity for technology integration. Teachers lacked the equipment and sustained professional development. The Technology Integration Lead Teacher (TILT) Program changed that. We are now 7 cohorts in and I'd hoped to reach 10 before completely shutting the program down. You can read about it online. The program was sustainable with the State Technology Allotment and not grant dependent...and that was great! This past year, we implemented a related program focused on campuses where teachers--with their principal--could join as a cohort. Where TILT was scattered across the District where teachers could apply, CRUISE enabled them to participate all from one campus.
                                        5. Content Management System for District and Campus web sites. After pouring money into Dreamweaver maintained sites, it became apparent that campuses could not maintain their own web sites...too much mobility in staff, lack of training in spite of our best efforts meant that web sites were horribly out of date (years out of date). Paying for a proprietary or commercial content management system would have cost dollars per students, an expense that could not be tolerated under the budget available. I advocated and supported the move to transition all campuses and departments to an in-house implementation of Joomla. My team has worked tirelessly to empower distributed web site maintenance to campuses with great success. Now, you don't have to be a wizard at Dreamweaver...instead, you can spend 2-3 hours learning your way around Joomla and update your campus web sites. We have principals that do this because it's so easy.
                                        6. Technology Applications:TEKS Curriculum and Benchmarks for Middle School. When I arrived in my current district, there was no TA:TEKS Curriculum...teachers still taught computer literacy in whatever fashion they chose. Sometimes, it was good, sometimes it wasn't...it depended on the teacher. There was no expectation or support. I conducted a needs assessment, hired curriculum writers, and required implementation of a curriculum. Later, this curriculum was wholly revised, moved online and placed in Moodle course management system to facilitate online/F2F blended instruction.
                                        7. Online Learning Capacity. When I arrived in my current district, there was no capacity for facilitating online learning. Moodle? What's that? And, there was no web presence featuring online tutorials and resources for educators, community and students. As such, my team and I worked hard to build that capacity and now we meet the needs of hundreds of teachers and over 4000 students who access online learning opportunities using free open source software like Moodle and/or hosted solutions like PBWorks.com wiki. In all honesty, without these resources, my current district would completely lack experiences in learning online, a fact that is frightening to consider in light of how online learning is exploding in K-16 and adult learning. I can't imagine pulling the plug on our online learning efforts, which have grown to exceed our face to face workshops and interactions.
                                        8. Way of Assessing Technology Usage in Schools. Making the case for technology integration has always been tough because leaders often don't understand the value of it. That's why I worked hard to establish benchmark assessments using a variety of instruments, such as the LOTI and STaR Chart, to provide data to decision-makers. Over time, that data has been collected and made available to leaders. I'm pleased to say that it has influenced campus level decisions and provided direction.
                                        9. Digital Video Distribution System. Before cuts in funding and lack of integration with core content crippled the use of digital video, I worked hard to move my current employer from videotape to web streamed videos. This move saved the District money AND enabled greater usage...in fact, usage of web streamed videos easily exceeded videotape usage on campuses, a fact that never failed to surprise proponents of videotape.
                                        10. Technology planning. Technology planning of instructional activities grew under my leadership and the teamwork of my colleagues. Our technology plan, when submitted as an eplan, garnered high scores and moved the District forward. You can see that here.
                                        11. Technology Competency Certification Plan (TCCP). I envisioned a technology competency certification plan, that my team developed and we tried to implement. The plan has been adopted and used in different school districts, even if only partially successful in mine.
                                        12. Various Administrator Technology Institutes. This involved a variety of institutes for administrators on the use of technology to improve their own productivity, learn how to assess technology use in classrooms. These were successful but slowly lost momentum over time.

                                        Earlier this summer, I put together a presentation that shared quickly, briefly some of what we're doing--all of which is in jeopardy. As I view that presentation, I must confess that I am depressed about the hard work of so many will be cast aside and that they will find themselves returning to the classroom as teachers without the technology tools that they need. It is a waste.

                                        2009-2010 breakdown of Professional Learning
                                        2007-2008 Breakdown...Instructional Technology offered incredible amount of training opportunities. More graphs here.


                                        In spite of all that, I have worked hard to find the silver lining. For a few brief moments, as I watched Jeremiah Johnson begin a new life so different from the past one, I imagined a new adventure, away from public schools and the unfortunate decisions leading to their destruction. It is that new adventure that beckons now, calls to me.

                                        I can only hope that those brief moments are enough to weather the storm that darkens my sight, saps my energy, and makes me long for yesterday. To do that is death...I must look forward.

                                        The future is unwritten.




                                        Be sure to read 7 Tips for Managing Joblessness and 9 Ways to Search for a Job in a Texas Tough Economy


                                        Get Blog Updates via Email!
                                        Enter your email address:


                                        Delivered by FeedBurner

                                        PingIt!
                                        Delicious Bookmark this on Delicious
                                        Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org


                                        Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure

                                        Subscribe via email

                                        Enter your email address:

                                        Delivered by FeedBurner