Money Stream Goes Dry
No more Title 2, Part D...someone remind me, why did I vote for Obama? Sheesh.
Tim Holt asks some important questions about state organizations like TCEA and national ones, like ISTE. In the end the effort for advocacy was too little too late. But the real problem is that technology continues to be an after-thought in today's education. When the money stream runs dry, what will YOU be doing tech specialists?
March 31, 2010
TO THE ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESSED:
SUBJECT: NCLB Federal Funding Limitations for School Year 2010-2011
Appropriations of funding under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) contained in the U.S. Department of Education’s (USDE) 2010 Appropriation Act passed by Congress in December 2009 greatly reduced the federal formula funding available to local education agencies (LEAs) for the following two programs for the 2010-2011 school year.
Title II, Part D – Enhancing Education Through Technology, LEA Formula Program
Title IV, Part A – Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities, State and LEA Formula Program
The appropriations act reduced the funding to Title II, Part D by over 60% causing the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to only be able to continue to fund the discretionary Title II, Part D program for the coming school year. In addition, the appropriations act did not fund State and Local Title IV, Part A programs for the coming school year but rather allocated all the funding to the USDE to implement competitive grants from the national level. LEAs will not receive a formula allocation under either of these programs for the coming school year.
LEAs with unexpended Title II, Part D formula and/or Title IV, Part A funds available at the end of the current grant year may carryover those funds into next school year’s grant application. However, the LEA must estimate that carryover amount(s) and request the funds from TEA by including the funds in the LEA’s 2010-2011 NCLB Consolidated Application for Funding.
Carryover for the Title IV, Part A program is statutorily limited to 25% of the current year’s allocation unless TEA approves a waiver to this limitation. Due to the circumstances of the program not being funded for next school year, TEA will review any submitted waiver requests to exceed the 25% carryover limitation with as much flexibility as possible.
Continuation of Services
TEA encourages LEAs to continue to implement both grant programs with fidelity and integrity for the remainder of this grant year and to plan for the most effective uses of any available carryover funds. In addition, the LEA may want to review USDE’s latest guidance on the allowable uses of Title I, Part A funds [available athttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/nclb/PDF/titlei-reform.pdf] to determine existing activities which may be continued with Title I, Part A funds. Information regarding allowable costs for educational technology on
Title I campuses begins on page 38 of the document and activities to improve the school climate on Title I Schoolwide campuses is addressed on page 26. The use of Title I, Part A funds to meet these costs is not a violation of supplement, not supplant rules as the provision does not apply between federal programs.
USDE Competitive Grant Opportunities
TEA strongly encourages Education Service Centers (ESCs) and LEAs to apply for the various Title IV discretionary grant opportunities at the federal level. All of USDE’s grant competition application packages may be viewed athttp://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/index.html. Most grants related to the Title IV program will have a code of “[OSDFS]” to the right of the grant name.
If you have questions regarding applying for any carryover funds, please contact your regional ESC or the NCLB application staff in the Division of NCLB Program Coordination at .
For assistance with using Title I, Part A funds for educational technology or school climate activities, please contact Ms. Annie Molina at .
For assistance with locating federal Title IV grant opportunities, please contact Ms. Carolyn Smyrl at .
for School Improvement and Support
Education Service Centers and school districts should be doing everything they can to achieve FREE. Why not GoogleApps for Education?
Subscribe to Around the Corner-MGuhlin.org
Everything posted on Miguel Guhlin's blogs/wikis are his personal opinion and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer(s) or its clients. Read Full Disclosure